April 8, 2012 6 Comments
Cristian Fernandez has been incarcerated since March of 2011. He faces two separate trials – one of which carries a mandatory life without parole sentence if he is convicted. Cristian is 13 years old today, but he was barely twelve when he was arrested and subsequently indicted on first degree murder and aggravated child abuse by Florida State Attorney Angela Corey. The combination of charges allows Corey to seek life without parole, while eliminating the requirement that she prove Cristian intentionally caused his brother’s death.
Examination of the facts surrounding Cristian’s complex case provide insight into the State Attorney’s decisions as well as later actions she took against the boy. These will be detailed, along with the progression of events throughout this sad case. A petition I started, requesting that the State Attorney reverse the decision to try Cristian as an adult, may be found here. The petition has over 184,000 signatures to date.
Nothing about Cristian’s life has been easy. He was born to a mother who was just 12 when she had him. She became pregnant at the age of 11 after being sexually assaulted by Cristian’s biological father. The father was imprisoned on charges directly related to her pregnancy and would later be described as having little to do with his son.
At the age of two, Cristian and his mother were placed in the same foster home after the “authorities found the toddler walking around dirty and naked outside a South Florida motel while his grandmother, who would have been about 34 at the time, nursed a drug habit inside.”
At just three years old there were indicators that Cristian had experienced more than just neglect. Department of Child and Family Services reported that Cristian, still only three, pulled down the pants of a six year old and simulated a sex act. No information was provided about where the three year old learned this behavior, but further information indicated that days prior to that he had caused the death of a kitten after it scratched him in the face. Though these behaviors strongly suggested that Cristian had experienced other types of abuse, nothing appeared to have been done about it.
Further indicators of sexual abuse were present when Cristian was five years old. It was alleged that he was found naked under a bed with his younger brother. The same year, it was also reported that Cristian was masterbating at school, drawing phallic symbols, and trying to pull down the pants of other children. Mental health evaluations were ordered by the court, but none of the records maintained by the Department of Children and Family Services stated they had taken place or that Cristian was provided with therapeutic treatment for the behaviors. Minimally, a more complete investigation into potential sexual abuse of Cristian should have been conducted.
When Cristian was eight years old the Department of Child and Family Services was advised that Cristian had been sexually molested by a male cousin who was 12. In a psychological report it states, “There has been confirmation of physical and sexual abuse in his records. The sexual abuse has likely been more extensive than what has been verified, as Cristian showed sexualized behaviors at a very young age that were likely an imitation of what he has seen or been subjected to.” The psychologist also noted that Cristian had “been exposed to parental antisocial behavior, criminal actions, and substance abuse. His lesson from parental figures at an early age was that people respond to frustration by engaging in violence.”
In January of 2005, when Cristian was almost six years old, his mother married Luis Alfonso Galarrago Blanc. Luis would go on to live with the family until October of 2010 when he committed suicide in front of Cristian’s three siblings. Luis was facing an arrest when police were notified that Cristian had come to school with a severly swollen eye. When the police responded to the home they found a very young David trembling and covered in blood.
The Florida Times Union reported that following the stepfather’s suicide, neighbors of the family “saw young Fernandez taking bag after bag of clothing and personal items out of the apartment in tall, white plastic bags. The boy’s mother refused to let them help the boy.” The neighbors said they could not believe what they were seeing – that Cristian had taken all of the family’s belongings downstairs completely on his own. “If he did it,” the neighbor said in reference to fatally injuring David, “He did it out of frustration – he couldn’t take it anymore.”
In a court order detailing the termination of his mother’s, Biannela’s, parental rights it states, “The child, Cristian, has suffered significant physical and emotional abuse during his life. In October 2010, the child suffered an eye injury that required surgery at the hands of his step-father, Luis Alfonso Galarraga, who is now deceased. Cristian will need long term therapy.”
During a later psychological evaluation it was revealed that the stepfather, Luis, had abused Cristian a number of times. The psychologist indicated that Cristian described incidents where “he was punched in the back or stomach.”
Following the stepfather’s suicide, Biannela moved her family to Jacksonville, Florida. In January of 2011, David’s leg was broken while he was allegedly in Cristian’s care. Though the mother never indicated the injury was intentional, she attempted to hide what had happened to her son and refrained from seeking treatment for two days. The Department of Family Services, in Jacksonville, conducted an investigation.
The outcome of the investigation is not available to the public. It is unknown whether the State Attorney’s Office was notified about David’s broken leg and his mother’s attempt to conceal it from authorities. This event raises difficult questions about what might have happened had family services removed the children from the home or even sought treatment for Cristian in a juvenile facility or intensive therapeutic program. This was yet one more opportunity for the system to do the right thing by the entire family, failing miserably in the process.
On March 14th of 2011, Cristian was left for an undisclosed amount of time to care for the mother’s three younger children. At the age of twelve, Cristian had become a regular caregiver to children whose ages ranged from 2 to 6. This was an enormous amount of responsibility for a child his age and given the fact that the youngest child had previously been harmed in Cristian’s care, it was a negligent and irresponsible decision.
Though it is unclear as to the extent law enforcement investigated the toddler’s death, a few details have been circulated concerning the event. First, Cristian told police that he pushed his brother into a bookcase twice out of anger. He indicated that his brother lost consciousness. Second, Cristian contacted him mother to inform her that the young child was hurt. Third, she returned home and spent the better part of an entire day failing to appropriately respond to her son’s fatal injuries until driving her son to the hospital in the evening.
The choices made by the adults in Cristian’s life had long been tragic and unfortunate. However, no decision would serve to have greater consequences on his young life than the one his mother made when she waited approximately eight hours to seek treatment for her unconscious child. It is unlikely she or Cristian had any idea that if David died the twelve year old would face what is tantamount to a living death sentence – life without any possibility of parole.
Regardless of the circumstances, the family’s history, and the mother’s role in her son’s injury, Cristian was arrested on March 15 of 2011. The time of the arrest was given as 4 a.m. He was questioned by Detective Mechelle Soehlig who held a position as a homicide detective with the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Department. In a heavily redacted police report it states that Cristian admitted to hurting his brother. The report also indicated that he was worried about what was going to happen to his brother, who was receiving treatment at Shands hospital. At the time of the interview David was still alive and on life support.
The report lists the investigative time as consisting of nine hours. Because David was still alive at the time Cristian was questioned and arrested, he was taken into custody for aggravated child abuse.
At the time of Cristian’s arrest, he was a sixth grader at Kernan Middle School. He was earning straight A’s, had no record of suspension, and appeared to be functioning well in the school environment.
Even though Cristian was arrested on the 15th, Biannela’s arrest report showed that she was not taken into custody until April 1st of 2011 at 5:30 p.m. It is unclear why she was not arrested until two weeks following her young son’s death, especially given her history of neglect, her prior poor judgement, and the system’s failure to address the family’s significant problems much earlier on.
This decision, on the part of law enforcement, poses questions about the intensity of the prior police investigation into David’s death. For example, did the police question the neighbors about who was living in the home? Did they ask about anyone coming in and out of the home, or whether anyone observed anything unusual happen on the day David was injured? The police report indicated that she was brought in on an outstanding warrant, but what prompted them to arrest her following questioning? More importantly, why did it take them two weeks to do it?
The police report is revealing in that is described how the mother had habitually lied about her son’s injuries – both when his leg was broken in January of 2011 and then again when he was allegedly injured by Cristian. She admitted to police that she had waited two days to seek treatment for David when his leg was broken “when they were wrestling”.
Initially Biannela told the police she was in the kitchen when David was fatally injured. She later admitted that she was away from the home and that she was notified by Cristian that David had been hurt. She said she waited approximately two hours to seek treatment for her son. This information was later contradicted by the release of court reports showing the mother waited nearly eight hours to seek treatment, spending time online listening to music, checking her bank records, and researching head injuries.
In the police report it states, “Dr. Mcintosh, the Child Protections Team physician who examined the victim, told this affiant that if the suspect would have sought immediate medical action, there would have been a possibility that the victim would not have succumbed to his injuries.” It was a shocking revelation. Had Cristian’s mother obtained treatment for her young son as soon as she learned of his injuries he might have survived.
The information made the issue of guilt and culpability far more complex than it originally seemed. Another odd piece of information would later come from a psychological report by Dr. William Meadows. The report indicated that after Biannela was informed her young child would not live, she made the statement to police that “she had been through worse.” After elaborating, it became clear that she was referring to the suicide of former husband. This was a strange statement coming from a mother who had just lost her youngest child. However, given the family’s history it is not difficult to see that Biannela herself was charged with enormous responsibility from a very young age.
The arrest report stated that the amount of time spent with Biannela before her arrest was one hour. This was in sharp contrast to the nine hours that were reportedly spent with Cristian prior to his arrest.
People who knew Cristian and his family were stunned by his arrest. Neighbors informed the media that the charges were completely out of the child’s character and they described Cristian as “quiet, shy, and polite.” An elderly neighbor described seeing Cristian frequently doing the family’s laundry. When she asked him about it he explained that he was helping his mother who he claimed was working.
The Public Defenders Office in Jacksonville, Florida took on Cristian’s case. Assistant Public Defender Rob Mason discussed his client and the criminal charges against him, stating: “The whole system has failed him. This child clearly is a victim. We think he can be rehabilitated and, as his lawyers, we will fight for that.”
As Cristian spent months in a juvenile facility, his lawyers began to work on mounting a defense. During that time, Cristian was examined by two separate forensic pathologics. Both reported that he was emotionally immature “but essentially reformable despite a tough life”.
The defense wanted Cristian tried as a juvenile from the beginning. In reference to Cristian, Mason told the media, “He is motivated for treatment. He has insight. He knows he needs help and he desperately wants help, and I don’t think he can get the help in the state prison system.”
In June of 2011, Public Defender Matt Shirk made a written request seeking the removal of Circuit Judge Elizabeth Senterfitt from Cristian’s case. In the request he cited concerns about Senterfitt’s marriage to the Undersheriff, Dwain Senterfitt. The Public Defender’s Office was preparing to present arguments that the jail was not appropriate for their young client.
Shirk was concerned with Cristian’s placement in the Duval County Jail. Undersheriff Senterfitt was responsible for policymaking related to the jail, which presented a conflict of interest since the defense wanted to request that Cristian be returned to the juvenile detention facility. At the time the media reported that Shirk requested a new judge, on June 22nd, Cristian had already been held in isolation at the county jail since June 3rd for 23 hours a day.
The following day, the media reported that the judge recused herself from the case. A previous gag order put in place by the judge prevented parties involved from discussing details surrounding the case. Judge Mallory Cooper was assigned to Cristian’s case.
Though the defense pushed to have Cristian moved back to the juvenile facility where he would have contact with others, maintained a good relationship with a mental health counselor, and would receive an education, the State Attorney’s Office fought to keep Cristian in isolation at the jail.
The effort placed in keeping Cristian in the Duval County Jail was disturbing for several reasons. First, it suggested that the intent of the State Attorney’s Office was to process Cristian completely as an adult. While some children who are charged and later convicted of adult crimes are provided with the opportunity to serve until they are 18 (or in some cases older) in a juvenile facility, the motion filed to prevent the twelve year old’s return to that facility demonstrated the desire of the prosecution to keep the child in adult facilities. If the prosecution ever intended to allow Cristian to serve time in a juvenile facility it did not seem likely they would have made such a substantial effort to keep him at the adult jail in isolation, completely separated from other inmates.
The treatment of Cristian was inhumane at best. Chief Circuit Judge Donald Moran, prior to the appointment of Judge Cooper to the case, made the decision to allow Cristian to return to the juvenile facility. He stated, “The point is, there’s an inability to treat him as an adult. I don’t even know if this boy is guilty. He’s presumed innocent. I’m just uncomfortable holding him in isolation for up to 360 days.”
At first Angela Corey appeared to recognize that the juvenile court would maintain jurisdiction over Cristian until he was 21. In June of 2011, following her decision to seek an indictment against him for murder and aggravated child abuse, she said, “My fear is that whatever has happened to this young man in his short time on Earth cannot be solved in eight years.”
This statement was made following a psychological exam that was faxed to the State Attorney’s Office on May 26th of 2011, stating the following regarding Cristian: “The youth has the intellectual ability to benefit from rehabilitative intervention that targets his anger management problems, impulsivity, deceitfulness, depression, and psychological dysfunction related to a history of having been abused physically and sexually. He has the resources to benefit from a behavior modification program.”
The above recommendation was made under the assumption that Cristian was responsible for fatally injuring his brother, demonstrating that the worst case scenario was taken into account regardless of the presumption of innocence all Americans are supposed to have before facing a trial in criminal court. It meant that even if Cristian had produced the injuries that contributed to David’s death, the psychologist still felt he was amenable to rehabilitation.
The report indicated that the State Attorney’s Office had asked for a psychological evaluation to aid in decisionmaking regarding how to try Cristian. “It was requested by the Duval County State Attorney’s Office that the undersigned conduct a forensic psychological examination on this youth to assist in deciding whether or not to file this case in Adult Court.”
Angela Corey ignored the psychologist’s recommendations and sought a grand jury indictment in adult court anyway. The indictment read that David’s death resulted from a “premeditated design”. The wording seemed out of place considering that the State Attorney had no evidence that Cristian had intended to kill his brother. In fact, had the act been intentional he would likely not have notified his mother about what happened, subsequently relying on her to seek treatment for the toddler.
Mark Caliel stated that the law was clear regarding treating juveniles who were charged with an adult crime as adults. Then he made a statement that was as misleading as it was nonfactual. He said, “If I were the parents of a kid charged with petty theft, I would be outraged if someone charged with first-degree murder were there right beside them.”
The media never questioned this statement or the veracity of making a claim that suggested the majority of children tried as adults were in the adult jail because of “petty theft”. On one hand, the statement may be construed to mean that the State Attorney’s Office is so aggressive in charging children as adults that a crime involving petty theft is deemed serious enough to seek to try the juvenile in adult court. On the other hand, the statement could also suggest that the prosecutors were trivializing the true nature of other juveniles’ crimes to justify trying to keep a twelve year old child in isolation.
Angela Corey told the press in October of 2011 that she never intended for Cristian to face life without parole. This statement was in contrast to her actions in that she sought two indictments that carried a mandatory penalty of life without parole if the defendant was convicted in court. She justified the statement by suggesting that a plea deal was always the ultimate goal. She failed to mention that she had brought excessive charges against the youth in an attempt to force him into accepting a plea.
She claimed to have spoken out in response to criticism she received worldwide regarding her decision to try a child as young as twelve as an adult. In a video response to my petition, Corey said, “Quite frankly, I resent people who don’t know anything about this case espousing opinions without knowing all the facts and circumstances.” She continued her statement with the following: “They’re looking at it as a social issue. But my obligation is clear: I am the chief prosecutor on this circuit and it is my job to enforce the laws that exist on this book…Not to respond to petitions, and not to try and legislate.”
However, she did not address the fact that she had other options when it came to Cristian Fernandez. Instead of trying him as an adult she could have allowed his case to go to juvenile court. Moreover, instead of indicting him on two charges, which combined exposed the child to life without parole, she could have sought to charge him for manslaughter. This would have been an identical charge to the one she pursued for Cristian’s mother and it would have made much more sense if her true goal was to achieve a plea deal or find middle ground.
That is not what Angela Corey did, however. In fact, she would later make a decision that erased any shadow of doubt that she was looking for middle ground or trying to find a way to punish Cristian, while also encouraging rehabilitation.
Many people watched the story of Cristian and his family unfold in the media. The majority of people who followed the case felt that a plea deal would be reached between the prosecution and the defense. Both sides communicated to the media that a plea deal was very likely. In fact, a pre-trial hearing that occurred on October 5th was describing as likely being his last.
Within one short month, a number of events took place that changed everything. Angela Corey presented the defense with a plea deal that required Cristian to admit to murder. The deal would have required him to serve until he was 21 years old, potentially exposing him to three years in an adult prison facility following incarceration in a juvenile detention center. Matt Shirk indicated the defense would reject any plea deal that required Cristian to remain in custody past 18. Shirk also indicated concerns about a plea deal that required his client to carry a murder conviction on his record for the rest of his life. This would make it difficult for Cristian to find employment and housing upon release. Additionally, it would make him vulnerable to future incarceration for the remainder of his life, even if he committed a minor crime.
Prosecutor Mark Caliel told the press that if an agreement was not reached by the following Monday he would file a motion seeking to combine Cristian’s trial with that of his mother. This was a bizarre suggestion since the two were facing significantly different penalties and because the mother’s parental rights had been terminated.
Shirk indicated that he was willing to continue with plea negotiations, but Caliel made it clear that the state’s offer was final.
By early December, the two sides still had not reached a plea deal. The defense indicated they were preparing for trial. At a December 5th hearing, Angela Corey told the media she might seek a third indictment against Cristian. Reporters described the charge as new, but information about it was contained in the motion filed by the State Attorney’s Offce in June, attempting to prevent Cristian from returning to a juvenile facility.
The charge was sexual battery in reference to a statement made by Cristian’s younger brother during therapy about sexual interaction between the two. The indictment did not provide an exact date for when the offense allegedly occurred, but rather indicated a range of dates. Cristian could have been as young as 11 when it happened. Despite the fact that he had experienced significant sexual abuse for which he had never been treated, and the fact that the charge was vague at best, Corey’s timing for bringing the charge was extremely suspicious. Why did she wait to announce the charge until the defense rejected the plea deal?
Angela Corey knew about the claim since June and yet she waited six months before bringing the charge against Cristian. She waited until the defense officially rejected the state’s plea deal and then the prosecution made the claim they did it because the defense asked them to delay seeking the indictment.
Though the statement made no sense at all, the media refrained from questioning the State Attorney’s Office about the timing of the charge or the fact that it completely contradicted Corey’s original claims that she was not seeking life without parole for Cristian. After all, she made those statements after she became aware of the claim made by Cristian’s five year old sibling.
The decision to bring a sexual battery charge against Cristian was shocking. First, if convicted as an adult he would be required to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life, even though he was a minor at the time and remained a minor when the claim was made. Second, the penalty if convicted of the offense was severe. Then there were questions about the implications such a conviction might have on other youth in the future? At what point do children cease being a victim and become a full on perpetrator? The charge did not make sense, especially given Cristian’s background and his lack of opportunity to receive the treatment he needed and deserved for his own abuse.
In addition, Corey was not longer acknowledging the true length of time that the juvenile system would have jurisdiction over Cristian’s case. In a media interview that took place at the hearing where Corey announced plans to possibly seek a new indictment, she stated that if he were tried and found delinquent in the juvenile system they would not even be able to hold him for two years.
The Southern Poverty Law Center released a statement explaining that this was false information and stated the following:
Florida law grants the juvenile system broad discretion to handle the treatment and rehabilitation of children like Cristian, including the power to imprison a child until he has been sufficiently rehabilitated. Because of this, the juvenile justice system is better situated to protect public safety. The juvenile courts can retain jurisdiction over children until the age of 21. Most importantly, the juvenile system promotes treatment and rehabilitation — including requiring mental health treatment where necessary — while the adult system simply does not.
I contacted the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice a number of times to inquire about this matter. I was informed that the above statement made by the Southern Poverty Law Center was true and that the court would retain the ability to monitor the child’s progress and extend the length of his or her stay in a program if the juvenile was not achieving successful rehabilitation. The court would maintain this authority until the child was 21. This would also prevent Cristian from carrying a criminal record for life.
Another issue with trying a child as young as Cristian as an adult was that according to studies pertaining to children tried as juveniles versus adults, kids are more likely to re-offend at a later date if tried and sentenced in the adult system. One reason for this is exposure to adult prisons which are punitive. These facilities do not focus on rehabilitation. Another reason relates to the removal of the child from society at a time when mental and emotional development progresses quickly. Failure to interact within society, and increased exposure to individuals who have committed crimes, only serve to cement the mindset that criminal activity is preferred, especially when these youth are cut off from findng or maintaining a healthy support system. Finally, children who emerge as adults from prison have criminal convictions that severely limit their ability to function in an environment outside of prison.
In response to the breakdown in plea negotiations, Judge Cooper set a trial date for February 27th of 2012. Corey was successful in seeking the third indictment against Cristian. Within another month, a coalition of private attorneys who had approached the Public Defender’s Office and offered their assistance in the case made the decision to take over the case completely. Armed with the recommendation of Cristian’s appointed guardian ad litem, Hugh Cotney, the attorneys filed a motion asking permission to take over.
Shirk was hesitant to withdraw from the case, but on the 2nd of February he publicly announced that he was stepping aside. The defense retained the assistance of Rob Mason and Debra Billard, who had been working with Cristian for a long time. One of the private attorneys, Hank Coxe, informed Judge Cooper, “I just want to make clear with everyone here…that none of us ever suggested any concern about the quality of representation of Mr. Shirk’s office.”
The private attorneys had previously assisted the defense in filing motions to attempt to stop Corey from seeking a third indictment against their young client. These efforts were unsuccessful.
In anticipation of a trial on February 27th, I approached a woman I had been working with to coordinate events and other advocacy efforts on behalf of Cristian. We decided that it would be a good time to plan something that might help to generate more awareness about Cristian’s situation. We decided to plan a rally even though neither of us had ever been involved in that kind of an event. Previously, I had helped organize a community briefing that took place in Jacksonville in November.
The rally took place outside of the Duval County Courthouse on February 8th and a copy pf my petition was delivered to the State Attorney’s Office asking Corey to reverse her decision to try Cristian as an adult. Angela Corey would not accept the petition herself and so it was given to staff members, tied in an orange bow to signify the color of Cristian’s jumpsuit.
To date, an official trial date for the murder and aggravated child abuse charges has not been set. Cristian has been detained for over a year. Instead, the trial date for the sexual battery charge was set for late June. Cristian will go to trial twice, regarding three separate indictments. If this all takes place this year it will happen while Cristian is thirteen years old. He is the youngest person in Duval County to ever face life without parole.
Had Angela Corey allowed Cristian’s case to remain in the juvenile system he would have already had a hearing. If found delinquent he would have been placed into a program and would already be receiving intensive rehabilitation. Because she did not take this action, Cristian is not in a specific rehabilitation program, though he does receive counseling within the juvenile detention center. Valuable time has been lost.
Another option Corey could have presented to the defense would have been a plea deal wherein Cristian was incarcerated in a juvenile facility until he was 18, but was then placed on probation for several more years. The prosecution could have asked the judge to withhold adjudication, upon successful completion of his sentence, so that Cristian would not have a criminal murder conviction on his record. Such approaches have been used in the past and would have provided the prosecution with the ability to find the middle ground they claimed they were seeking. A similar agreement was reached in the case of Arva Betts - a 12 year old female who was charged in the killing of her younger brother.
In late March of 2012, Biannela pleaded guilty to the charge of aggravated manslaughter. Neither Biannela or her attorney, Shawn Arnold, provided much insight into the appearingly improptu decision. However, when asked about it, Biannela responded that the decision was in her “best interest”.
Assistant State Attorney Mark Caliel acknowledged that Biannela’s behavior during the course of her children’s lives had established a clear pattern of neglect. He even admitted that she was neglectful when she failed to seek immediate treatment for her youngest child – a decision that could have meant the difference between life and death for young David.
Caliel also explained that Biannela could be called as a witness for the prosecution or the defense, hinting at the possible underlying motive for Biannela’s sudden decision to put in a plea of guilty in reference to the manslaughter charge. Or perhaps preparing the public for the inevitability of Cristian’s mother testifying – possibly against her own son.
In addition to working on Cristian’s case, Angela Corey has been assigned as the special prosecutor on the Trayvon Martin case. She has not yet announced whether she will bring charges against George Zimmerman. Many have protested her involvement in the case. A number have people have questioned whether a criminal conviction is even possible, such as Jose Baez who made this statement to the press, “I just don’t see a conviction down the line here. I really don’t.” Somewhat serendipitously, Hal Uhrig who critiqued Baez’s legal work during the Casey Anthony trial, has signed on to defend Zimmerman in the event charges are brought against him.
Advocacy efforts continue on behalf of Cristian Fernandez who is now thirteen and reportedly doing well in the juvenile detention center. Letter writing campaigns for Angela Corey, Rick Scott, and even Pam Bondi have yielded no significant response. Bondi defers to Governor Rick Scott when she declines to get involved in the case. Scott defers to State Attorney Angela Corey. This raises questions about accountability in Florida – particularly Jacksonville where it appears a prosecutor may use full discretion to engage in the activities I have described above.
The State Attorney is not even fully accountable to voters because the voting public cannot force a challenger to run against Corey, giving the community the option of voting her out of office.
Ironically, Cristian Fernandez is not and was not old enough to vote in elections pertaining to each circuit’s state attorney. When charged as an adult he was not old enough to drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, or drive a car either. He still isn’t.
At this point it seems that the only real opportunity Cristian has for fair treatment in the justice system is to appeal to much higher authorities. For this reason, I will be conducting an email and letter writing campaign that urges the public to contact United States Attorney General Eric Holder as well as President Obama. This will begin on Monday, following Easter Sunday. We have attempted to contact various officials in Florida without success and so this is merely the next logical step in our advocacy efforts.
To take part, please write and/or email both in reference to Cristian’s case using the following contact information.
Please also take a moment and sign my petition asking Angela Corey to reverse her decision to try him as an adult. He belongs in the juvenile system.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Contact online: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/submit-questions-and-comments